By Shadi Mokhtari
Mokhtari's booklet examines the alterations within the human rights discourse within the usa and the center East after the maltreatment and torture of the U.S. captives within the Abu Ghraib and different prisons grew to become public. in the course of the textual content research of speeches and information stories, in addition to in-depth interviews with human rights NGO officers, she makes an intensive overview that either credit and criticizes the NGOs. Mokhtari indicates that human rights advocacy has been profitable in pushing the U.S. courts and Congress to acknowledge the relevance of foreign human rights legislations.
Read Online or Download After Abu Ghraib: Exploring Human Rights in America and the Middle East PDF
Similar human rights books
The Human Rights Committee began its paintings lower than the non-compulsory Protocol at its moment consultation in 1977. From then until eventually its seventy-fourth consultation in 2002, 1069 communications in terms of alleged violations through sixty nine States events have been put earlier than it for attention. This quantity offers interlocutory and ultimate judgements from the sixty-sixth to the seventy-fourth periods.
Even if human rights NGOs, and particularly household human rights NGOs, became an important to the human rights flow through the years little or no literature exists which describes their operations or units out a framework within which they are often severely tested. This e-book units out to start to fill this hole via concentrating on how NGOs mobilise the legislation and the way their effectiveness may be measured.
In 1995, the overseas Committee of the purple go, besides a number well known specialists, embarked upon an immense foreign learn into present nation perform in humanitarian legislation for you to establish favourite legislation during this sector. This ebook (and its better half, quantity 2: perform) is the results of that research.
Europe and the ecu Union are unavoidable, if ambiguous, political references within the post-Yugoslav house. This quantity interrogates the kinds and implications of the more and more powerful symbolic nexus that has constructed among non-heterosexual sexualities, LGBT activism(s) and Europeanisation(s) in the entire Yugoslav successor states.
- Migration, Citizenship and the Challenge for Security: An Ethnographic Approach
- Law and globalization from below
- Fire in the Heart: How White Activists Embrace Racial Justice (Oxford Studies in Culture and Politics)
- The SAGE Handbook of Human Rights: Two Volume Set
- Humanity across International Law and Biolaw
Extra info for After Abu Ghraib: Exploring Human Rights in America and the Middle East
Bush (Jan. 25, 2002), reprinted in supra note 26, at 119. 36 Transcript of the Hearing on Military Commissions and Tribunal, House Armed Services Committee, 109th Cong. (July 12, 2006). 32 Id. 36 AFTER ABU GHRAIB discussions, the clear implication of his words is that complying fully with the Geneva Convention protections could be considered proceeding with naivet´e. The Bush administration similarly marginalized international human rights law by repeatedly asserting that it was composed of various legal obligations that were vague or undefined.
AMERICAN IMAGININGS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE MIDDLE EAST 23 Closely linked to these relational identity constructions has been a dualistic view of culture. Although there are explicit and implicit assumptions of Middle Eastern societies’ human rights “nightmares” being linked to the trappings of a conservative religion and culture, the United States is viewed as standing in a space that is essentially free of culture and religion or culturally and religiously neutral. 4 Yet American positions on international human rights instruments or treatment of domestic rights issues often encompass the same cultural dimensions attributed to human rights engagements in Eastern contexts.
The era’s American military interventions were presented as in essence part of a long tradition of “sacrifice for liberty,” that, although “not always . . ”20 The United States’ power continued to be portrayed as rooted in its superior values and good intentions. 21 As Stanley Hoffman has observed, the “War on Terror” . . 22 Further, the Bush administration clearly enlisted and evoked the human rights geography critical scholars have mapped out, building on assumptions of inherent or ontological American commitments to universalism and the furtherance of the human rights project as well as corresponding conceptions of Middle Easterners as inherently incapable of fully understanding or achieving rights on their own.